| REDUCING
YOUR CENTRE'S SUMMER LOSSES (April 1996) Summer presents a
financial challenge to many centres as enrolments often decline when
families make alternative care arrangements in July and August. Centres
with school-age programs are most susceptible to enrolment drops in the
summer. In addition, many staff naturally prefer to take their holidays
during the summer. This increases the need for casual staff to maintain
child-to-staff ratios. In the past many
centres have covered summer losses with surpluses earned during the rest
of the year. Given declining enrolments and the possible reduction of
subsidized spaces, centres may not have surpluses to rely on for
subsidizing summer programs. As a result reducing summer losses and
maintaining a viable program all year long are critical. April is the time to
finalize summer plans. If your centre's summer program isn't planned by
the middle of May parents may make alternative care arrangements.
Following are some suggestions to help cover summer costs. Do you expect a loss
this summer? First you need to
determine whether your summer program is expected to cover costs or run at
a loss. Prepare a simple budget for July and August.
You now have an idea of
whether your summer program will incur a loss or not. Losses arise from
one of two sources: too little revenue or too many expenses. Let's look at
how you might both increase revenue and decrease costs. Controlling revenue
losses A drop in enrolment is
the single biggest reason for losses in the summer. To keep enrolment
numbers up and revenue high:
Setting summer fees If you expect your
centre to be full then you are well on the way to maximizing your
centre"s revenue. However, you may still have to increase fees to pay
for extended school-age programming and possibly for increased July and
August casual staff. To calculate how much you may need to increase fees
you must first estimate expected extra costs. Lets assume you intend to
offer a program for 6 to 12 year olds with an average enrolment of 13
throughout the summer (i.e. anticipating 2 vacancies). Extra costs can be
calculated as follows:
If you are currently
charging $12/day you will now need to charge $22/day for 6 to 12 year old
children during the summer. Will school-age parents be willing to pay
this? Survey the parents now to find out. Cost cutting
measures What if you do not
expect have a full program? This can be very expensive. For example, being
short five preschool children for the two summer months could cost your
centre in the order of $6,000. You need to determine how to reduce costs
to cope with this. Here are some strategies you should consider: Focus on reducing
significant costs As mentioned in our
last issue (Volume 1 Issue 3, p. 9), any attempt to significantly reduce
costs must focus on salaries and benefits as these expenses typically
make-up 80% of total costs. Cutting less costly program items such as
trips, food and supplies may not result in sufficient decreases and these
components of a program are generally critical to quality of care and to
attracting parents. If you remove trips from the budget to save $400 for a
month you could end up with a program that neither parents nor children
like very much. Minimizing staff
costs In the summer centres
often need higher than normal levels of casual staff to fill in when
regular staff take vacations. Some techniques to minimize casual staff
costs are:
If your centre
experiences an enrolment drop in the summer then you may need to reduce
core staff costs to avoid a loss. Ways to do this include:
There are many ways to
reduce staff costs during the summer period. You need to make sure that
you adequately balance staff and childcare needs with financial necessity
in the process. Closing the centre
for a week or two Some centres choose to
close for one or two weeks in the summer. You need to look very closely at
the financial consequences before you choose this option. Generally costs
saved are not significant. Staff are usually required to take their
vacation during the (two week) closure. This may or may not be convenient
for staff and their families and may result in morale problems at the
centre. Two possible advantages
of a summer closure are:
Lets look at an example
of a two week closure where parents are not charged. In this example, as
is often the case, revenue losses exceed cost reductions. The closure
costs the centre money. In this situation staff
receive their regular pay while they are on vacation. As a result there
are no reductions in normal salary costs. The cost reductions come from
being able to reduce casual staff throughout the summer as all regular
staff are expected to work during the same seven weeks (they all have to
take the same two weeks off as well). This casual staff savings generally
does not offset the revenue reduction. You can also see that reduced
program costs such as food and trips result in only relatively minor cost
savings. Also note that Metro Children's Services ("Metro") will
generally not pay for days the centre is closed if parents are not
charged. Children transferred out to other centres for the period of
closure may not transfer back. Centres that close for
a period without charging parents are usually worse off financially than
if they stayed open throughout the period. The second variation on
this theme is closure for one or two weeks while continuing to charge
parents for childcare. In our above example the centre would reduce costs
by $3,700 while not reducing revenue in the short-term at all. This $3,700
saving would be at the expense of possibly annoying parents. Loss of one
full-fee paying parent as a result of this policy would cost the centre
dearly for each month the vacancy remains. Given that attracting full fee
paying parents and maintaining enrolment is currently so difficult this
course of action is not recommended. September
reservation fees You could consider the
possibility of charging parents who withdraw their children from the
centre in the summer a fee to reserve spaces in the fall. We have found
that this works well only if your centre has a substantial waiting list
for the fall. If you do not have a waiting list then parents will often
take a gamble that spaces will be available at the end of the summer and
merely re-register in September. Also, the advantages of charging a
holding deposit are probably outweighed by the negative impact of parents
having to pay fees without receiving care. Closure for the
whole summer There are situations
which would make closure of the centre for the summer months the most
advisable situation. These include:
In these situations
your centre would offer a ten month program and close down for July and
August. Offering a ten month program poses difficulties mainly for those
centres with a significant number of spaces funded by Metro. Children
transferred out to alternate care arrangements in the summer months may
choose not to return in September. Consequently, the option of closure for
the summer months is generally taken only by centres with a high
proportion of full-fee paying parents. If your centre is going
to close for the summer first consider the following:
The decision to close
the centre for the summer is a serious one and should only be made by your
Board after discussions with all parties involved including parents,
staff, MCSS and Metro. |
|
||||||||||