| ONTARIO
PAY EQUITY – OBLIGATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES (January
1998) Our article on Pay
Equity in the previous issue of The Not-for-Profit Financial Advisor
created a flurry of questions and requests for clarification. There
appears to be confusion as to the rights and obligations of employers
under the Pay Equity Act and the Pay Equity Amendment Act of
1993 (collectively referred to as "the Act") and the mechanics
and rules of implementing pay equity increases. In this issue we will
review the pay equity obligations of your organization and its Board of
Directors. We will also review the rules for calculating pay equity
adjustments and the mechanics of distributing the funds to employees. Obligations and
Rights Organizations
covered by the Act The Act covers
employers in both the private and public sectors in Ontario. In the
private sector employers who employed an average of ten or more employees
in 1987 or at any time since 1987 are covered by the Act. All
organizations in the public sector in Ontario are covered by the Act. A
list of entities defined to be in the public sector is included as a
schedule to the Act. The list covers a wide range of independently
incorporated not-for-profit organizations providing services funded by the
Ontario government. The detailed list includes, among many others, all
organizations operating: ·
a day nursery or private home day care
agency licensed under the Day Nurseries Act. ·
programs providing service to day
nurseries under the Ministry of Community and Social Services Act. ·
elderly persons centres funded under the Elderly
Persons Centres Act. ·
children’s services programs funded and
purchased by the Ministry of Community and Social Services under the Child
and Family Services Act. The list in the
appendix is lengthy and essentially mandates that all organizations funded
in part by a Ministry of the Ontario government must comply with the
requirements of the Act. Note: All
organizations in the public sector that were incorporated on or after July
1, 1993 are not required to use the proxy method. The job-to-job and
proportional value methods still apply to them. Intent of the Act
and implementation dates The Act is intended to
correct the historical undervaluing and lower pay of work performed by
women. The intent of the Act is to specifically address gender imbalances
and provide wage parity between women and men working in jobs of equal
value. The intent is not to equalize wages between jobs of similar value. The Pay Equity Act
became effective January 1, 1988. The Act requires employers to compare,
within the same organization, jobs done by women to those done by men. The
"job-to-job comparison method" may not be adequate to achieve
pay equity where there are too few male job classes against which to
compare all female job classes. The Ontario government passed the Pay
Equity Amendment Act on July 1, 1993 to promote pay equity in
organizations not able to use the job-to-job comparison method for all
female job classes. It provides a mechanism for: ·
comparing female to male jobs within a
specific organization used the "proportional value method". This
method allows an employer to infer a pay equity job rate for female job
classes where there is no exact male job class for comparison purposes. ·
employers in the "broader public
sector" to compare their own female jobs to female jobs which have
already been compared to male jobs in a different organization. This is
called the "proxy method". The proxy method is
only available to employers in the broader public sector. Also, the proxy
method must be used for all female job classes where even one female job
class cannot be compared to a male job class within the organization. The proxy method for
public sector employers is effective as of January 1, 1994. The
implementation process is gradual and could take many years. Organizations using the
job-to-job and proportional value methods, on the other hand, must have
achieved pay equity on or before January 1, 1998. For these organizations,
pay equity should have been fully implemented by now. Compliance in future
will be limited to ensuring pay equity is maintained between male and
female jobs of equal value. Background to the
Proxy Method Most organizations
required to use the proxy method have already prepared and commenced
implementing a pay equity plan by now. Those required to use the proxy
method applied for the proxy method by first notifying the Pay Equity
Commission that they tried but could not find a male comparator position
for at least one of the female job classifications in their organization.
This situation applied to all organizations that have no male job classes
at all such as childcare centres. A review officer from the Pay Equity
Commission then verified that the organization was an employer in the
broader public sector and that it could not achieve pay equity by
job-to-job or proportional value methods. The organization was issued an
order requiring it to use the proxy method. Once an organization
received its proxy order from the Pay Equity Commission it had to use the
proxy method for all job classes in the plan regardless of whether or not
a male comparator existed for one or more female job classes.
Organizations that did not get a plan in place previously must now go
through the application process. Preparing Pay Equity
Plans Organizations receiving
an order requiring use of the proxy method then prepared a pay equity plan
using the proxy comparison method. Note that organizations with unionized
and non-unionized staff pools must prepare one pay equity plan for
non-unionized employees and also negotiate a separate pay equity plan with
the bargaining agent for each separate bargaining unit. The steps to
complete a pay equity plan are: ·
identify your key female job classes ·
select your proxy organization and
request job information ·
assign values to your organization’s
job classes ·
receive information from your proxy
employer ·
determine the value of proxy job classes
and job rate of proxy job classes ·
develop a proxy job rate line and compare
your own job classes to the job rate line ·
determine required pay equity adjustments
for your female job classes ·
post your pay equity plan ·
begin to make your pay equity adjustments Most organizations
required to have proxy comparison pay equity plans will have already
performed the above steps, prepared the pay equity plan and posted it.
("Posting" a plan refers to making it available to all the
employees of the organization.) If you have not prepared a pay equity plan
and you believe your organization may be required to do so then you should
call the Pay Equity Commission (416/481-4464) and commence the process
now. For an excellent description of how to complete a pay equity plan,
ask the Pay Equity Commission to send you a copy of their booklet: A
Guide to the Proxy Comparison Method. Changes Subsequent
to Posting a Plan Organizations creating
a new job classification (not to be confused with creating more jobs under
an existing job classification) should value the job in a way similar to
how existing jobs were valued. The new job classification should then be
compared to the proxy job rate line and the new position should receive
pay equity adjustments in the normal course of business. Calculation of
annual pay equity adjustments Once you post your pay
equity plan you must calculate and distribute pay equity adjustments. Pay
equity salary adjustments (i.e. pay equity salary increases) are required
effective January 1, 1994 under the Act. This implementation date is also
effective for pay equity plans posted subsequent to January 1, 1994. Calculating total
salary increases Employers are required
to make annual pay equity adjustments by distributing a minimum of 1% of
the organization’s previous year’s payroll. The increases must be
distributed among all job classes entitled to a pay equity adjustment.
Using 1994 as an example, employers should have adjusted job rates in that
year by distributing a minimum of 1% of the organization’s 1993 total
payroll. For each subsequent year, the organization must make pay equity
adjustments again using a pool of funds equal to at least 1% of the
previous year’s payroll. The annual adjustment process continues until
actual job rates equal their pay equity job rates. Calculating annual
payroll Your organization’s
total annual payroll for purposes of the minimum 1% proxy method job rate
adjustment is the gross employment income of employees for that year. In
most situations this amount will equal gross employment earnings as noted
in Box 14 of your T4 Summary prepared at the end of each calendar year.
For example, if the 1996 T4 Summary shows total earnings of $278,500 then
in 1997 your organization is required to increase job rates of staff by
not less than $2,785. Note that generally
total payroll excludes statutory and non-statutory benefits that are not
included in employees’ T4 taxable income. You should also exclude
one-time bonuses paid to staff where the bonuses are not expected to occur
on a regular basis. Distribution of pay
equity adjustments The distribution of the
minimum 1% annual pay equity adjustment must follow four basic rules: 1.
Every job class that requires a pay equity adjustment must receive
at least some increase each year. 2.
Every employee in the same job class must get the same dollar value
adjustment. 3.
The lowest paid female job class in each pay equity plan must
receive the largest dollar value pay equity adjustment. 4.
No pay equity adjustment should be made to male or gender neutral
job classes. The first three rules
can make distribution of pay equity adjustments among staff problematic.
We recommend you adopt the following method for distribution of pay equity
raises: 1.
Determine the minimum required amount of the salary increase for
the year (1% of your prior year’s total salaries from box 14 of theT4
Summary, less one-time bonuses). 2.
Refer to your posted pay equity plan and identify all staff whose
current pay is lower than their pay equity job rate. 3.
Set the increase for the lowest paid female job class. 4.
Allocate increases to all other positions at amounts less than the
increase allocated to the lowest paid female job class. There are several
factors to take into account in the process. ·
Employees covered: The Act applies to
full and part-time staff only. For purposes of the Act, part-time staff
are deemed to be those employees working at least one-third of the regular
workweek of the organization and whose positions are ongoing. All non-full
time employees whose jobs do not fit this description are not covered by
the Act. ·
Job rates: The term job rate needs
clarification, especially where remuneration includes bonuses and salary
grants. The job rate is defined in the Act as the highest rate of
compensation for a particular job class. Compensation includes: -
regular salary ·
Calculation of job rates: For ease of pay
equity calculations, all job rates should be expressed as a dollar per
hour amount (e.g. $10.25/hour). To calculate the job rate for staff paid
an annual salary, divide annual salaries, including salary grants, by the
number of hours in your organization’s standard work year [e.g.
$32,000/(261 days worked x 8 hours per day) = $15.33/hour]. ·
Correctly distributing pay equity: The
lowest paid female job class must receive the largest dollar value
adjustment. All other job classes can receive the same or different
adjustments providing they are less than that received by the lowest paid
female job class. As an example, assume the cook, earning $8.50/hour, is
in the lowest paid female job class. If this class receives a 124 /hour
adjustment then all other job classes must receive an adjustment of 114
/hour or less. ·
Annual adjustment deadline: Pay equity
adjustments must start January 1 of any given year. The September 30
deadline ceased to exist once Schedule J amending the Act was repealed in
September 1997. Staff employed in the year who have left the organization
before the pay equity adjustments have been made are still entitled to
receive their adjustment for the period they worked. ·
Informing staff of annual adjustments:
Staff must be specifically informed that a raise is intended to be the
annual pay equity adjustment. In some instances organizations gave staff
raises in 1997 without realizing that a 1% pay equity increase was also
required. Retroactive characterization of the raise as the annual pay
equity adjustment is not technically permitted. The organization is
supposed to make the pay equity adjustment in addition to the regular
raise unless an agreement can be reached with the staff. Staff may agree
to the reclassification if management can demonstrate that the
organization has insufficient funds to give a raise over and above that
already given. See the section on Review and Compliance Process below. Pay Equity Funding Many not-for-profit
organizations currently receive pay equity funding from either the
Ministry of Community and Social Services or the Ministry of Health. There
is some confusion as to whether the funding received completely offsets
the recipient organization’s funding obligations. The position of the Pay
Equity Commission is that, regardless of funding arrangements made by
various Ministries, organizations must always base distributions on 1% of
the actual preceding year’s payroll. This calculation must be done each
year. The Ministry of
Community and Social Services ("MCSS") started funding pay
equity in 1994. The amount received annually by many organizations from
MCSS equals 3% of 1993 base salaries. We understand from discussion with
MCSS that this funding is to cover pay equity adjustments for 1994, 1995,
and 1996. This pay equity funding will only be sufficient to cover an
organization’s funding obligations where payroll costs in 1994 and 1995
did not increase over those in 1993. In situations where payroll costs
have increased from 1993 amounts and the pay equity funding (based on the
1993 amounts) has not been supplemented then the full amount of required
pay equity adjustments may not have been made. Where funding is
received from the Ministry of Health, the 1994 pay equity adjustment of 3%
is considered to be a 1% 1994 adjustment and a 2% "bonus" to
help speed up the equalization process. Organizations receiving this type
of pay equity funding are still required to make 1995 and 1996 pay equity
adjustments. Given that funding is so scarce these days, most
organizations in this position are treating the 3% 1994 adjustment as
coverage for the 1994, 1995 and 1996 obligations. The relationship
between compliance and funding is made more complicated by the fact that
the Pay Equity Commission has no responsibility for funding of the
payments and the funding ministries have no responsibility for compliance.
Staff on the Pay Equity Hotline does not provide information on Ministries’
funding plans. Therefore they are not in a position to determine whether
an organization is in compliance with the Act without a full review. In
our experience, staff at the various funding Ministries have limited
knowledge of pay equity requirements. When trying to resolve issues with
the "authorities" be very careful that all parties involved are
dealing with the same set of facts and assumptions. Review and
Compliance Process Compliance with pay
equity requirements is based on self-assessment. Organizations are
required to comply with pay equity legislation regardless of their
financial circumstances. There are currently no annual filing requirements
with the Pay Equity Commission. Consequently, a review of your pay equity
practices for failure to comply with the regulations will not be initiated
unless there is a formal complaint filed with the Commission. If your organization
cannot afford to make its annual pay equity adjustment in any given year
then we recommend you discuss this with the employees. You may be able to
negotiate a plan for pay equity increases in the event that funds become
available. In the event you cannot
reach agreement with employees, a complaint may be lodged with the Pay
Equity Commission. A pay equity review officer will contact your
organization. The Act sets out processes for resolving disputes that may
arise in establishing, implementing and maintaining pay equity. Review
officers will often mediate pay equity adjustment claims between
organizations and employees in an attempt to reach a compromise position
that the organization, the employees and the Commission can live with. Directors’
personal liability Note that Directors of
not-for-profit organizations are personally liable for unpaid wages and
salaries of an organization under their incorporating legislation and/or
the Employment Standards Act. We understand that unpaid pay equity
adjustments may fall under the definition of wages and salaries in the
relevant Acts. If that is the case then the directors could have personal
liability for unpaid amounts. If your organization is unable to fully
comply with its pay equity obligations then we recommend that you obtain
legal advice. What To Do If You
Have Lost Your Pay Equity Plan You will need your
original posted pay equity plan to make the 1997 pay equity adjustment.
Original plans were never filed with the Pay Equity Commission. From our
talks with the Ministry of Community and Social Services we understand
that that they did not retain a copy of the plans originally filed with
them. Toronto area childcare centres may be able to obtain a copy their
plan from Metro Children’s Services. If you can no longer locate a copy
of your organization’s original pay equity plan then you unfortunately
may have to re-do it and re-post it. How to Get Help If you have questions
or require detailed assistance regarding the legislation you should
contact the Pay Equity Commission in Toronto at 416/481-4464. The staff
are extremely helpful and a pleasure to deal with. For questions about
funding of your pay equity obligations you should contact your funding
Ministry directly. We can also be of assistance. If you would like your pay equity implementation plan reviewed please contact either Barb Scott or Phil Cowperthwaite at 416/323-3200. We will review your current pay equity implementation policies and procedures, ensure you are in compliance with the Act, help ensure your system is administered as efficiently as possible and prepare a brief report of our recommendations for your Board of Directors. |
|